this is a free high school resource center for students interested in learning
Friday, 30 December 2016
Development of modern transport systems:
The development of transport systems was one of the important colonial economic policies. Reads, railways, ports and harbours were put in place irrespective of the colonial power whether has Britain, France, Germany, Portugal, Italy or otherwise.
Reasons for development of Modern transport System in
Colonial Africa.
1. For strategic reasons, as for example, Uganda railway was built to confirm and improve British commercial and strategic reasons in Uganda (the source of River Nile) which Egypt survived on.
2. Promotion of missionary activities:
Roads and railway network systems in Africa were built to enhance the spreading the gospel. This was because the' first group of missionaries (1840s) could not do much, because of communication problems.
3. Effective occupation:
The Berlin conference had dictated that for the recognition of colonial power in a given African territory, there had to be effective occupation of the colony i.e. develop the infrastructure facilities like schools, roads, health centers etc
4. The exploitation of Agriculture and mineral wealth:
The f~ produce included cash crops such as coffee, cotton, sisal, cocoa and palm oil while the minerals included copper, gold, diamond and iron.
5. Humanitarian grounds:
The transport system was developed in order to assist in elimination of slave trade and support the development of legitimate trade.
6. Roads and railways were built to open up interior of Africa for overseas countries purposely to serve as market for their manufactured products. This led to the construction of many railway lines connecting West African States, Central Africa, East Africa to the coast.
7. Development of colonies:
The road network was established in order to make colonies self reliant through the cultivation of cash crops which they could sell to foreigners and be transported to the coast. Such crops include rubber in Congo and West African territories, Palm oil, Coconut, Cotton and Coffee.
8. For effective administration of colonies:
The transport system was constructed in order to ease the mobility of
Colonial economy:
Added on: 09 Mar 2016
Last Modified on: 09 Mar 2016
After scrambling, partitioning. imposition and colonisation of African continent, there
followed the establishment of colonial administration with an efficient colonial economy to support it by African indigenous economies to those of metropolitan countries.
As already observed that the most overriding motive for partition of Africa was economic, this colonial economy therefore, was designed in a such way that it solved the economic interests of the colonising powers, for example, it could provide them with raw materials, market for their manufactured goods and also land for their surplus investments. To achieve these properly the colonial governments had to build strong exploitative institutions backed by a good infrastructure to make colonies self sufficient and reduce the costs of administration.
1. Taxation:
Characteristics of Colonial economy in Africa:
This was one of overt features of colonial economy.lt was the main method of generating revenue needed to run costs of colonial administration.The commonest were the hut and gun taxes.The method of collection was brutal and harsh at times thus making taxation a sound cause for African resistance wars.For example, hut tax war of 1898 in Sierra Leone.
Taxation was also important to compel or condition Africans either to grow cash crops or to work on European farms. This was because in order to get money for paying taxes these were the only possible alternatives. In some areas such as the Congo Free State and Angola taxes were paid in form of Natural products (in kind) and animals. Failure to pay taxes in
these areas would tantamount to confiscation of property and sometimes mutilation..
2. Forced labour:
Africans were unconditionally made to work on European farms, mines, construction of
colonial offices and roads. Their labour was either paid cheaply or not paid at all. In Portuguese colonies of Angola and Mozambique there was a unique form of forced labour called contract labour. Africans could be rounded up and taken to islands of Principe and Sao Thome in the Indian Ocean to work in sugarcane plantations.But unfortunately they would die there quite often ..
3. Development of Legitimate trade:
This was developed to replace slave trade. This new trade is said to have brought peace and stability as it eliminated the raids and accompanying miseries of slave trade. Moreover
. some African traders profited a lot in this new trade. For example, in Nigeria the selling of palm oil made many African traders quite rich.
However, this trade was monopolised by Europeans who transferred or repatriated all the profits to their mother countries. On top of this they paid low prices to African products and charged highly their exports to Africa. Worse still, this trade involved the exchange of high valued African products like gold, copper, diamonds, cotton, coffee, rubber, palm oil etc. while their exports to Africa included beads, used clothes, necklaces, bangles, spices,
glassware items etc. This is why so many scholars doubt whether legitimate trade was legitimate since it served to underdevelop and exploit African economies. .
4. The creation of the Import-Export Economy
The colonialists emphasised vertical division of labour that installed vertical exchange of their products. Africans were made to consumewhat they do not produce and produce what they do not consume. Cash crops were introduced and Africans .encouraged to produce and export them. In tum they would import European manufactured goods. It should be noted that exports were under-priced while the imports were overcharged. This kind of trade
.dependence stopped African economies from being integrated and self-sustaining.
5. Forced cultivation of cash crops
To meet the primary demand for colonisation of Africa, cash crop growing had to be boosted. Some crops were grown traditionally like rubber at start, some by whites such as pyrethrum while others by Africans, for example, coffee and cotton at supervision of whites. These cash crops were important to boost the industrial revolution that was at climax by 1880 in Europe.
It should be noted however that no attempts were made by Europeans to encourage the production of food crops and forced labour undermined the production of food crops and this led to famine in African societies which traditionally had been self sufficient in terms of food. The African economies were developed as producer of raw materials in form of cash crops plus minerals and consumer of European manufactured goods .
Domination of trade:
In almost all the African colonies, Africans were discriminated against both in commercial production, home trade and export trade. For example, with the construction of Uganda railway, the whites dominated trade. In Senegal and Algeria the French controlled the trade. The British got involved directly in the Niger Delta States thus removing African middlemen.
In some countries like Algeria and South Africa, Africans were discriminated against on the grounds that they were inferior. African monopolies formerly enjoyed by Delta States and the coastal leaders of East Africa came to an end with the coming of European trading companies such as the Royal Niger Company, the Germany East African Company and IDEACo. This brought to an end of African economic independence.
Discouraged industralisation
To control monopoly for source of raw material and market for their manufactured goods in Africa, Europeans extremely discouraged the setting up of manufacturing industries in Africa. For example, in Egypt, Lord Crommer just established processing plants for cotton raw material while corton cloth textile industries remained a monopoly of metropolitan British.
He set up tariffs on locally manufactured foods and on imported coal. He also put up heavy fines on smokers to kin the tobacco industry. Consequently Egypt which was one of the producers of best quality cotton of the time, continued to import cotton cloth from Britain.
Important to note also was Lord Crommer's construction of Aswan High Dam which he never used to produce vower for industralisation except for cotton processing industries.
.
In Senegal, for example,' the French never-set up any industries to the extent that even groundnuts were exported in their shells. The only industries set up:: were primary processing industries which were aimed at reducing the bulky-raw materials, The .p.j;iqesat r which these raw materials were sold were very low while the manufactured goods Imported
were at very high prices to Africans. This 'was a clear indication of colonial exploitation.
8. Land alienation.
This was the worst form of African exploitation of natural resources in colonial Africa. Africans in settler colonies were hit hardest by this. exercise, for example, in Kenya . highlands: South Africa, Rhodesia, Algeria, Angola and Mozambique. Africans could be settled in reserve camps leaving fertile and mineralised plots of land to whites. At the signing of treaties in Africa, white men aimed at taking over African land especially We plots which were mineralised- and fertile, for example, the 1887 Globler, Moffat treaties
and the Charles Rudd concession of 1888, Cecil Rhodes aimed at clearing off the rumour about presence of minerals ill Ndebele kingdom by conqeuring Matebeleland.
9. Another important aspect on the nature of colonial economy was the manner in which African technology was interfered with. For example, before colonialism, Africans used to produce most of their domestic needs such as bark cloth, hoes, spears, knives, axes etc. The coming of colonialism saw the introduction of better tools and commodities. The acquisition of these items forced African to abandon their own skills. On this note, Mohamood Mamdani had this to say;
"the African entered colonialism with a hoe he had manufactured himself and came out with an imported one".
This shows that, if Africans had not been colonised, Africans would have developed the
technologies further.
10. Development of road and railway transport:
For colonial development of legitmate trade, road and railway transport network.
establishment becatne paramount. Tqis network connected the interior ofcolonies to the,
coast. More to this, these roads and railways were mainly established in resourceful areas- where colonialists had direct gains. For example, in West Africa Togo land, Germany. s; constructed railway lines and 'named them after the produce they Were meant to carry suct~- as Cocoa nut line, Cotton line, Palm oil line and Iron line
11. Education system
Education institutions were manned by mainly Christian missionaries. In these institutions Africans were given skills to serve as lower cadres of colonial rule. The main products of this educational institutions best suited the posts of houseboys, house girls and clerks. They could not make Engineers; Doctors and other professional. careers.
Their curriculum was dominated by the teaching of the. Bible and did not involve practical skills. The weakness with this education is that it created people who were intimate to European ways of life, a factor that made them exploiters of fellow Africans on behalf of
the colonialists. In Ugandathe priority was offered to the sons and daughters of chiefs. In
French, Portuguese and Italian colonies education served purposely assimilation aims. .
Nationalistic subje .ts such as pyschology, political science,literature and history were neglected in order to keep Africans away from forming revolutionary movements against exploitative ,oppressive and suppressive policies of colonialists.To colonialists the best subjects fit for Africans was Bible study.Reading and Writing oflangUa~es.
12. Exploitation of minerals:
It has been claimed that the exploitation of mineral wealth had some advantages. e.g. Africans were employed in the mines, it lea to urbanization, for example, in Congo and South Africa plus the general improvement of their standards of life.
However, Africans in the mines were underpaid, as for instance, in South Africa, Congo and Togo mines Europeans monopolised all the benefits from the mining activity. All mineralised lands were taken free or by force from the Africans. The conditions of workers in mines were quite miserable as a result of poor wages. African skilled and semi skilled geologists especially those in GoldCoast (Ghana), Nigeria, Togo-land, South Africa and Zimbabwe were ignored in terms of sufficient wages. Hence the exploitation of minerals in colonial Africa held a strong element of underdevelopment.
All in all, it is clear that colonial economicpolicies were designed primarily to benefit the colonial masters. Many Africans 'however accidentally benefited as a result of these policies which were purely designed to benefit the colonialist. Colonial economy was therefore more exploitative than developmenta1.
Revision questions.
Discuss the role of Africans in the colonial economy.
Assess the impact of colonial economic changes in either Nigeria or Congo.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment