Conditions
of the peoples of South Africa before the discovery of minerals
The Boers before the discovery of
minerals lived in chronic poverty and were politically weak.
Before the discovery of minerals
African communities like the Zulu, Sotho were better off than Boer communities
military strength. In battle victory could go either way.
Economically, African states were
better off than white communities in the interior before the discovery. They
practiced viable agriculture and trade unlike the Boers who lived in abject
poverty.
The Sotho, Zulu, Ndebele were
internally prosperous and able to produce goods for export like hides, skins,
ivory and occasionally slaves.
Boer agriculture had initially been
hit hard by adverse economic conditions like lack of inputs and machinery .
The whites were somewhat poor in all
areas.
There were no meaningful industries
associated with mining, and food supplies.
Africans were economically proud of
their economy and communities. Africans like the Pedi, Griqua, Tswana and other
had watering areas, grazing land and powerful organized states.
Africans were not offering their
labor market for minerals and mines.
The British had tried to advocate
for racial equality, condemned racial prejudice or racial segregation of the
Africans. They took Africans as equals.
Before the discovery of minerals the
whites in the interior of South Africa could not run European style of life
with Presidents and had no adequate means to do it.
Conflicts between the whites to
control South African affairs were there but on less scale. This later led to
the Anglo-Boer wars.
The British policy was not aimed at
federation of South African states.
The scramble for South Africa had
not been engineered on large scale before 1867. African societies were intact
with their cultures and social bonds.
Modernized infrastructures were not
there. The white miners or Uitlanders (outsiders) had not come. Urban areas
were not all that modem.
Generally most Africans were poor
before the discovery of precious minerals; Bonds of kingship among the Africans
were strong.
The Bitter relations between the
whites existed.
Effects
of the discovery of minerals on the Africans
The effects were mainly negative;
Africans completely lost their
independence as loyalty of the Africans shifted to the whites who were
employing them. There was migration from rural to urban areas where the
Africans looked for employment on mines and farms.
The economy of the blacks changed
because they had taken their land. They were now landless. Africans were now
squatters and continued to provide lab our in the mining industries.
There was disintegration of African
societies as men left or separated with their wives to go and work in towns.
There was discrimination of Africans
in employment centers. They did unskilled labor while certain work was reserved
for the poor whites.
Africans were forced to live in
camps and slums, which surrounded the mining towns .
Africans lost a lot of their land
especially where minerals had been discovered.
There was a break down in African
cultural norms and there was an emergence of a new African social norm. The
previous system of trade (barter trade) was replaced with a new cash economy or
monetary system.
Africans were paid low wages because
they offered unskilled labor; they were forced to work on contracts and they
could go to work for short periods before returning home.
The British political influence on
Africans became greater.
Blacks
|
The adopted bad
traits, e.g. prostitution, homosexuality as they stayed away from their homes
for long periods.
There was decline of agriculture in
rural areas because there was no manpower to farm.
There was a power use in racial
segregation because there was competition for land, work and wealth. African
political consciousness and nationalism was consolidated and retained.
Effects of the discovery of minerals
on the Boers and the British
The effects were positive and
negative.
Prostitution, theft and crimes
increased especially among the poor whites that moved to towns. Boer states
emerged from poverty to wealthy states e.g. Transvaal and Orange Free State.
The British imperial schemes grew in
South Africa e.g. the formation of the Federation. Britain took over Transvaal
and Orange Free State but with Boer governance.
Conflicts between the Boers and the
British increased.
There was creation of labor shortage
for the Boer farms as Africans moved to mines.
The Boer attitude of controlling South
Africa increased. It strengthened the Boer alliance against the British. They
saw them as enemies.
There was development of
infrastructures like railways, roads, schools; for example the 1890's
construction of Natal - Transvaal railway.
As labor shortages increased, there
emerged a class of white miners called the Uitlanders. They attempted to
organize the 1895 Jameson's raid on the Boers in liaison with the BSACO. The
Boers pastoral economy disintegrated.
The Boer way of life was threatened;
land was no longer available for them and their sons.
There were droughts on Boer farms,
which caused a lot of cattle death.
The minerals had an effect of
bringing the whites together into contact against the Africans.
How
the discovery and exploitation of minerals in South Africa affected Anglo-Boer
(Boer - British) relations up to 1910
Relations between the Boers and the
British remained hostile from the time the British annexed the Orange Free
state (OFS) 1871 up to the Peace Treaty ofVereeniging 1902.
In 1871 the Boers rejected the
Annexation of the OFS after the Keate Award. They also rejected the
compensations that followed.
The British had to behave that all
the Boer occupied territories had mineral prospects and the intension to
colonize them. Conflicts between the Boers and the British increased after the
British threatened to annex Griqualand West and Transvaal.
British imperialist personalities
like Cecil Rhodes and many others started colonial extensions to include Boer
territories and Central Africam up to Cairo in Egypt.
The BSACO of Cecil Rhodes bought off
many Mining Companies in order to monopolies the minerals over the Boers and
also his personal interests.
The colonization of Swaziland (1868)
Botswana (1885), Lesotho (1884) and Rhodesia (1894) was in intended to
intimidate and encircle the Boer states.
The British brought many people of
European nationalists into South Africa during this period. These were the
Utilanders. The aim was outsmart Transvaal in population and mineral
monopolies. They came from Australia, Israel Russia, America, German,
Newzealand and Britain.
There numbers increased in 1885 when
Gold was discovery.
By 1896 they were over 50.000 in
Johannesburg compared to 6.000 Afrikaaners.
They remained sympathetic to the
British and were very close to John Cecil Rhodes and the BSAC against the Boers. Paul Kruger, the President of Transvaal
mistreated and alienated the Utilanders in many ways.
Utilander mistreatment encouraged
Cecil Rhodes and the BSACO to conquer Transvaal Boers in 1895 Jameson raid.
The Boers also rejected the idea of
Federation started by Sir. George Grey and Lord Carnaervon (1850's and 1870's).
The Cape Colony under British
control sent agents of the BSACO (L.S. Jameson and Frank Rhodes) to encourage
the
Utilanders in Transvaal to revolt
against the Boers and Paul Kruger.
The Jameson raid of 1895 was the
climax of Anglo-Boer tensions over mineral just as the 1880-81 First Anglo-Boer
war. The failure of the Jameson raid in 1895 set a stage for the Second
Anglo-Boer war 1899 to 1902 .
In 1902 the Vereeniging Treaty was
signed between the Boer and British representatives to end Anglo-Boer tensions.
Up to 1910, the Boers and tbe
British signed the Act of Union. This saw one united white community and
government in South Africa.
No comments:
Post a Comment