·
What led
to the scramble for and partition of Southern Africa
·
·
The Industrial Revolution in Europe.
·
The competition for raw materials
for their ind~tries intensified the scramble of the region to serve as sources
of supply.
·
Need for the investment of surplus
capital due to the accumulation of profits in these European countries - 'the
need arose for new areas where the surplus capital could be more profitably
invested. '
·
Pressure from European merchants and
trading companies upon their home governments to give them protection.
·
The prospect for the discovery of
large mineral deposits in other areas of South Africa in the wave of the 1867
Diamond discovery.
·
The influence which contemporary
European rivalries had on the scramble - Anglo-Boers conflict, Anglo German and
Anglo-Portuguese conflicts / rivalries.
·
After the acquisition of Alsace -
Lorraine in 1871, Germany was determined to acquire areas in Africa. This
worried the British goverhment.
·
Nationalism and prestige among the
Dutch and the British.
·
The Boer occupation of the Cape
stills the earliest times and the need to set up a permanent settlement and
control in South Africa and its interior.
·
Activities of other European powers
in the region Belgium. Portugal, German, Britain and the Dutch. The exploration
of the region.
·
The strategic importance of Southern
Africa and the latter British occupation of Egypt in 1882. This intensified and
speeded up the scramble of the area.
·
The 1884-85 Berlin Conference. It
created the feeling among the British that more speed was necessary in the
Scramble. The growth of nationalism in Europe to the extent of Jingoism.
National prestige and economic interests were the driving
·
force for imperial activities of men
like Cecil Rhodes, Jameson Leander Starr, and Paul Kruger among others.
·
The reports of explorers and
missionaries aroused a new interest in the Sub region.
·
Social conditions in Europe due to
the industrial revolution played apart like Mass Unemployment.
·
The Darwin's theory of evolution.
Although this was an absurd theory with no basis in truth, it did fire the zeal
of many European Empire building nations in Europe to the Sub region.
·
·
The actual
partition of South Africa and the rise of new imperialism 1795-1886
·
·
South Africa was partitioned by the
British and the Boers or the Dutch fanners. Of the two, the Dutch were the
earlier arrivals, but in 1795 the British took over the Dutch colony at the
Cape being of such strategic importance would be too big a risk to expose the
occupation by a hostile power or else the control of the Indian Ocean might
slip through British fingers.
·
Soon after this takeover, small
groups of Dutch settlers began to move further into the hinterland in search of
new pastures for their animals and new lands to settle.
·
The greatest exodus of the Boers,
(the Great Trek), occurred is 1836, for different reasons to avoid British
control. But the Boers had become British subjects since the latter takeover at
the Cape, and the exodus put the British in a dilemma, since the government
felt it had the obligation to extend its authority to all areas occupied by
them.
·
There was also the fear that was
left to their own devices; the Boers might cause a racial war in which the
British might find themselves involved. Besides the Boers might seize an Indian
Ocean port further north, thus undermining the British for colonizing the Cape.
·
Therefore powerful reasons existed
for following the Boers northwards, but an equally powerful reason militated
against over enthusiasm in pursuing an enlargement of colonial policy - the
heavy expenses involved.
·
That was the basic reason for the
adoption on the part of Britain of a policy that seemed to move backwards and
forward with regard to annexation or no annexation of Boer states - Transvaal
and Orange Free State, recognized by the British in 1852 and 1854 respectively.
·
In 1843, the British occupied Natal.
This area had earlier in the 1830's been declared the Republic of Natalia
(1838) by the Trek Boers. This later occupation was aimed at ctaimiog the Boer
threat to the Port of Durban.
·
Once in control in Natal, the
supposed policy of liberalism in the Cape was not militated - the British
adopted a policy of rigid racial segregation, which the Boers had followed with
regard to Africans.
·
This was prompted by the fear of
Zulu power. The apartheid (separate development), policy was given shape by
Theophilus Shepstone, the Natal secretary for Native Affairs from 1853-1875.
·
In 1840's mercantile-imperialism was
replaced with imperialism of Free trade' which by 1880's led to
capitalist - imperialism that revived colonial expansion.
·
Britain as the world's only mature
industrial power since 1740's was beginning to export surplus capital to invest
overseas. Other European nations and the USA were in the middle of their
markets for their own industrial revolutions and were looking abroad for
markets for their manufactured goods.
·
Capitalist countries challenged
British dominance of Free trade, first by protecting themselves from cheaper
British goods by high custom duties and secondly by expanding their protected
national markets through conquering their neighbours or seizing overseas
colonies.
·
Britain responded with its own
aggressive nationalism during the Conservative Party Government of 1874-80. The
very word imperialism entered the English language at that time.
·
Surplus capital - the profits from
Britain's industrialization - was invested in overseas development projects
such as railways and mining. These would expand the market for British
consumption.
·
British capitalists began investing
money in the Cape colony banks in the early 1960s speculating in the hope that
local companies would follow it at high interest rates to expand wool
production and interior trade.
·
So much money came in and moved from
bank to bank in such of greater profit, without sufficient development projects
to use it, that 28 of the 31 banks collapsed in bankruptcy during the Cape bank
crisis 1863-65 when investor suddenly withdrew their deposits. Only the two
London - based imperial banks and one Cape-based local bank survived.
·
There had been a depression in
British world trade during the 1870's after the collapse of a boom in American
railroad construction. But British capitalists noted that trade and profits did
not decline in other colonies unlike the USA and some capitalists therefore
began to think of colonizing Africa, which would remain profitable even during
world trade depressions.
·
The discovery of gold and diamond
made Southern Africa, the most attractive part of the continent for British
investment. Gold and other precious metals were needed in increasing quantity
for currency as world trade expanded, while diamonds were valued as
indestructible reservoirs of wealth by individuals recently grown rich in
Europe and America.
·
By 1880's Britain and Portugal were
already established colonial powers by also claimed enormous hinterlands from
their coastal colonies. The continent was then carved up between the European
powers in what was called 'the scramble for Africa. '
·
In Southern Africa, settler
capitalists and politicians pressed for the annexation of new colonies in the
interior, while the colonial office in London favored the cheaper alternative
of Treaty- States (or 'protectorates ').
·
The
Exploration of Southern Africa
·
·
There are no viable records on the
exploitation of South Africa. However the Dutch, Portuguese and British
travellers started the discovery of the area.
·
This was because of some discoveries
made in science and industry.
·
Geographers and explorers were also
eager to share in this age of discovery. Of all the 'unknown' regions of
the world, none was more interesting to them than - 'the Dark continent
-Africa.
·
What they wanted they particularly
wanted to explore were the great rivers, cross mountains and other hidden
motives their work.
·
From the late seventeenth and
eighteenth century onwards, rave Europeans came usually with very small
expeditions try to a map accurately the course of important rivers and
landscape and the institutional organization of African socieces
·
In his second expedition in then so
called 'journey across Africa' 1852 to 1856, Dr. David Livingstone set
out from en Town equipped as well as his scanty funds would permit, and
traveled northwards to Inyanti in Central Africa the cme: welcomed him.
·
He suffered the bad climate, malaria
fever; he was shocked by the barbarous customs and signs of slave trade. He ..
thus convinced than ever of the need to open up the interior to Christianity
and commerce and exploitation.
·
Many Dutch militias and travelers
who gave reports about land vacuum, geography and the inhabitable lands of the
Sot..! Africa interior. Leading Boer-Burghers explored Khoisan and Bantu land
in the interior.
·
These journeys took white men into
the heart of Africa for the discovered not only the geography of Africa for the
discovered not only the geography of the continent but also the wealth of the
continent as well. They began to urge the governments and territorial
monopolies and traders to send new expeditions into the interior in order to
establish friend, relations with powerful chiefs. Traders and missionaries also
were seeking official support from Europe and the governments. This led to what
came to be called 'the scramble for Africa. '
·
As for Central Africa, leadership
explorers were Portuguese nationals - Lacerda e' Almeida, Pedro Baptista and
Anasas.a Jose, Monteiro and Camitto, Siva Porto and.the British explorers
included-Dr. David Living stone, Thomas Baines and Dr. John Kirk.
·
It's important to note that European
exploration activity and interest in South Africa had been limited to the coast
an indeed penetration of the interior of Southern Africa was delayed or slow.
·
This was because of British-Boer
conflicts opposition of African rulers and middlemen traders, many coastal
middlemen in Natal resisted European penetration because they feared that it
would result in the loss of their lucrative position. ther were no practical
need for explorations, and they were not ready or prepared to bear the expenses
of maintaining suc territories.
·
At the same time the mercantile age
limited the work of exploration. Above all geography and climate impediments
limited their penetration.
·
The urge to penetrate the interior
of South Africa was due to British reforms at the cape that led to the Great
Trek (1830's), the industrial age in Europe, the prevailing spirit of scientific
enquiry in the world, the humanitarian movement (through missionaries,
Agriculturalists and traders), and national or imperial rivalries for the
acquisition of territories i Southern Africa (Namibia, South Africa Rhodesia,
Mozambique and the northward movement).
·
The effects of the exploration of
Southern African interior were that mush of the mystery of the interior was
solved settlement of the Dutch in the north of the cape, expansion of imperial
rivalries and Afrikaner nationalism, dealt a blow in slave trade and ground for
legitimate trade in central Africa.
·
It also prepared the way for
European missionary activity in South Africa and prepared the way for European
imperialists' activities, which led to colonial conquest and the partition of
the area
·
·
scramble
and partition of africa
·
·
The term Scramble for Africa means
the rush by European powers to get as many territories as possible on the
African continent. This took place before the last quarter of the nineteenth
Century in South Africa.
·
In the whole of Southern Africa,
this rush for colonies started before the nineteenth Century, but it did become
serious in l880s, which led to sharing of the area with Anglo-Boer tensions.
·
Therefore the term partition of
Africa means dividing the African continent among the scrambling European
powers. It was also done at the Berlin Conference 1884-85 and finally on land
thus victimizing the African continent.
·
Several reasons are put forward to
explain why the partition of South Africa did actually take place before 1880
than elsewhere in Africa. Despite this, the area was still considered a white
man's grave due to tropical diseases, the Europeans regarded the area as a dark
continent, there was a negative attitude towards colonies in the area due
to European colonial occupation elsewhere, other Europeans wanted to occupy
other areas or parts of the world, industrialization in Europe made the whites
expand to other areas and end the British monopoly.
·
Important
to note also were internal political
problems in Europe, explorers had also not acquired a favorable operational
atmosphere, but the discovery of diamonds in 1867 and later gold, pushed more
the Scramble for the area.
·
The reasons for the Scramble for and
partition of South Africa range from economic, philanthropic, strategic,
mineral discovery, racial purity, nationalism, European superiority over the
Africa race, imbalance of power in Europe after 1870 and imperial rivalry in
the whole of Africa.
·
For the sake of South Africa, the
Scramble for and Partition of was precipitated by traders like Cecil Rhodes,
the Uitlanders and tbe Boer traders in the interior of South Africa. Other forces
or agents included the Missionaries, ixplorers, travelers, collaborators, the
industrial revolution in Europe, the 1884-85 Berlin conference, imperialists
and European thirst colonialists.
·
The Scramble for South Africa
reached the highest peak due to Anglo-Boer tensions in the last quarter of the
nineteenth Century, the interference in the area due to German presence in
Namibia and the Portuguese hold of Mozambique and Angola.
·
The climax of this was the Union of
the whites in 1910 that dashed hopes for African existence and sovereignty and
the launch of Apartheid.
·
Note, that the Cape in south Africa was a strategic point, which
attracted many European explorers and the Dutch in particular who stayed there
until the coming of the British who invaded the area in 1795 and later 1806 in
their original land in Cape Province leading to the Great Trek upheaval in
1830's.
·
The Mineral discovery and consequent
exploitation was a factor that brought tension among many Europeans in the
whole of Africa.
·
The imposition of British and Dutch
Colonial rule in South Africa was done through the use of peaceful and violent
methods, which included treaty signing, divide and rule policy, use of
Missionaries, men onthe spot or the imperialists, chartered companies, deceit
and trickery, use of high commissioners and consuls.
·
The violent methods included gunboat
diplomacy, deployment method and that of outright military conquest as a last
resort.
·
One of the most important political
complication in South Africa brought about by the discovery of minerals was
theAnglo- Boer wars- 1880-1881, '1895',1899- 1902
No comments:
Post a Comment